APACHE JMETER VS OCTOPUS DEPLOY HOW TO
APACHE JMETER VS OCTOPUS DEPLOY WINDOWS

When using the Radar, we’ve found that the best approach is to think about how to balance the trade-offs of each tool, which comes down to understanding your problem in depth.įor example, a tool might be capable of solving a complex problem but it might not have enough flexibility to integrate with your ecosystem. On the automation infrastructure side, Terraforma and Pulumi are good options for infrastructure as code, while Consul helps with Networking. These should be chosen based on the level of functionality required.įinally, when considering automation configuration, the Radar helps choose between tools like Puppet, Ansible, and Chef for provisioning, Vault for secrets, and Packer for machine images. Next, they’ll look at containers for runtime and orchestration, which have plenty of options like Docker, Cri-O, Kubernetes, AWS ECS, and more. These might include Azure VM or AWS VPC for IaaS (infrastructure), Heroku or AWS ES for PaaS (platform), Firebase or AWS Cognito for BaaS (backend), and Azure Functions or AWS Lambda for FaaS (function). Operations first need to choose a service layer by selecting the best “whatever-as-a-service” according to the use case. Ansible has a broader approval, being mentioned in 955 company stacks & 578 developers stacks compared to Octopus Deploy, which is listed in 45 company stacks and 15 developer stacks.The next step to utilizing the Radar is to think about where to deploy the product, which means defining how the infrastructure will look. PedidosYa, Keen, and New Relic are some of the popular companies that use Ansible, whereas Octopus Deploy is used by Starbucks, AX Semantics, and Olo. Here's a link to Ansible's open source repository on GitHub. 'Agentless' is the top reason why over 251 developers like Ansible, while over 26 developers mention 'Powerful' as the leading cause for choosing Octopus Deploy.Īnsible is an open source tool with 37.8K GitHub stars and 15.8K GitHub forks. Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely.On the other hand, Octopus Deploy provides the following key features: Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate 'managing the management', and reclaim CPU cycles. Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere.Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.Some of the features offered by Ansible are:

APACHE JMETER VS OCTOPUS DEPLOY WINDOWS

Octopus works with your build server to enable reliable, secure, automated releases of ASP.NET applications and Windows Services into test, staging and production environments, whether they are in the cloud or on-premises.Īnsible can be classified as a tool in the 'Server Configuration and Automation' category, while Octopus Deploy is grouped under 'Deployment as a Service'. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy is detailed as ' Automated deployment for. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?ĭevelopers describe Ansible as ' Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine'.

Apache jmeter vs octopus deploy